Schedule a Consultation | Toll Free: 1-800-678-1307
Trial lawyers specializing in personal injury and civil litigation

Court dismisses claim after inadequate discovery compliance; confirms party must document expert's anticipated testimony

It is a common tactic of parties in litigation to provide vague and responsive answers to discovery requests.  Among the tactics frequently relied upon is the claim that a party does not yet know what testimony a disclosed expert witness may offer.  In Pagura v. McNeely Law Office, the Court of Appeals re-confirmed that a case can be dismissed where a litigant has repeatedly provided inadequate discovery responses.  The Court also confirmed that a party cannot disclose a potential expert witnesses' name and then argue that the witnesses' testimony is not yet known to the litigant.
Thompson O’Neil, P.C.
309 East Front Street
Traverse City, Michigan 49684
Toll Free: 1-800-678-1307
Fax: 231-929-7262